the PENGARUH PERSPEKTIF FACTOR INFLUENCING TEACHING (FIT)-CHOICE THEORY TERHADAP MOTIVASI MENJADI GURU PADA MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN AKUNTANSI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MEDAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55338/jeama.v4i3.673Kata Kunci:
FIT-Choice Theory, motivation to become a teacher, perception of teaching profession, teaching ability beliefs, accounting education studentsAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Factor Influencing Teaching (FIT)-Choice Theory terhadap motivasi menjadi guru pada mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Medan. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada masih rendahnya minat mahasiswa untuk memilih profesi guru, meskipun kebutuhan tenaga pendidik terus meningkat. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode survei. Populasi penelitian terdiri atas 60 mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi angkatan 2022 Universitas Negeri Medan yang seluruhnya dijadikan sampel menggunakan teknik sampling jenuh. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dan dianalisis menggunakan metode Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara simultan persepsi tentang profesi guru, keyakinan kemampuan mengajar, nilai utilitas, dan pilihan karier lain berpengaruh terhadap motivasi menjadi guru. Secara parsial, persepsi tentang profesi guru dan keyakinan kemampuan mengajar berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap motivasi menjadi guru. Nilai utilitas tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap motivasi menjadi guru, sedangkan pilihan karier lain berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa motivasi mahasiswa untuk menjadi guru lebih didorong oleh persepsi nilai profesi dan keyakinan terhadap kemampuan diri dibandingkan pertimbangan manfaat praktis.
Kata Kunci: FIT-Choice Theory, motivasi menjadi guru, persepsi profesi guru, keyakinan kemampuan mengajar, mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi
Referensi
Ambarita, A. (2020). PENGARUH PERSEPSI PROFESI GURU DAN EFIKASI DIRI TERHADAP MINAT MENJADI GURU MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN AKUNTANSI FAKULTAS EKONOMI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MEDAN. Universitas Negeri Medan.
J. Martínez-Moreno & D. Petko, “Motives for becoming a teacher in times of digital change: Development and validation of the (D)FIT-Choice scale,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, pp. 13221–13245, 2024
Z. Li & W. Y. Guo, “Pre-service teachers’ altruistic motivation for choosing teaching as a career,” Frontiers in Education, 2024
Student teachers’ motivation to teach: The roles of basic psychological needs, teaching self-efficacy, and teaching emotions,” Teaching and Teacher Education, 2024.
S. S. Kula, “The predictive relationship between pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy belief, attitudes towards teaching profession and teaching motivation,” International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 4, 2022.
Motivational Factors Influencing Pre-Service Teachers to Choose Teaching as a Future Career,” Journal of English Language Teaching, 2020.
MotiviEdge and teacher career motivation research articles saved in 2025 literary journals,” Teaching and Teacher Education, 2025 (motivation longitudinal study)
Novita, P. (2023). Teaching is (not) a career priority for student teachers: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Educational Studies and Multidisciplinary Approaches, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.51383/jesma.2023.78
H. M. G. Watt and P. W. Richardson, “Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2007.
P. W. Richardson and H. M. G. Watt, “Who chooses teaching and why?” Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 385–400, 2010.
S. K. Klassen et al., “Teachers’ self-efficacy,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 21–43, 2011.
A. Kyriacou and M. Coulthard, “Undergraduates’ views of teaching as a career,” Journal of Education for Teaching, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 117–126, 2000.
D. F. Putra et al., “Motivasi memilih profesi guru,” Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 89–102, 2018.
R. M. Ingersoll, “The problem of teacher shortages,” Educational Policy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 387–405, 2001.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The-Partial-Least-Squares-Approach-to-Structural-Equation-Modeling.pdf. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods For Business Research. Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
Hair, F. J., Hult, M. T. G., Ringle, M. C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling ( PLS-SEM ).
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of vocational behavior, 45(1), 79-122.
Annur, E. W., & Trisnawati, N. (2023). The Effect of Self-Efficacy and Perception of Teacher Profession on Teaching Interest: Study on Bachelor Students of Office Administration Education. Journal of Office Administration: Education and Practice, 3(3), 175-189.
Lotz, C., Hawlitschek, P., & Deiglmayr, A. (2025). From aspiration to passion – Investigating the role of career choice motivation and self-concept for teacher enthusiasm in early stages of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 165(July 2024), 105102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105102
Wang, H., & Klassen, R. M. (2023). Longitudinal relationships between teachers ’ utility values and quitting intentions : A person-organization fi t perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 127, 104109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104109
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Jurnal Ekonomi, Akutansi dan Manajemen Nusantara
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
