Motivasi Menjadi Guru dalam Perspektif FIT-Choice Theory pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Medan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55338/jeama.v4i3.673Keywords:
Persepsi Profesi Guru, Keyakinan Kemampuan Mengajar, Nilai Utilitas, Pilihan Karier LainAbstract
Rendahnya minat generasi muda terhadap profesi guru menjadi perhatian dalam upaya peningkatan kualitas pendidikan. Pada mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi, keputusan memilih karier mengajar dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor psikologis dan perseptual sebagaimana dijelaskan dalam kerangka FIT-Choice. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran persepsi profesi guru, efikasi mengajar, nilai utilitas, dan pilihan karier alternatif dalam menjelaskan motivasi menjadi guru. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain survei terhadap mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Medan. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner terstruktur dan dianalisis menggunakan regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi profesi guru dan efikasi mengajar berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap motivasi menjadi guru (p < 0,05). Nilai utilitas tidak menunjukkan pengaruh yang signifikan, sedangkan pilihan karier alternatif berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap motivasi menjadi guru (p < 0,05). Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa motivasi mahasiswa untuk berkarier sebagai guru lebih ditentukan oleh keyakinan terhadap kemampuan diri dan pemaknaan terhadap profesi dibandingkan pertimbangan manfaat praktis. Implikasi penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya penguatan efikasi mengajar dan citra profesi guru dalam pendidikan calon guru.
References
Ambarita, A. (2020). PENGARUH PERSEPSI PROFESI GURU DAN EFIKASI DIRI TERHADAP MINAT MENJADI GURU MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN AKUNTANSI FAKULTAS EKONOMI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MEDAN. Universitas Negeri Medan.
J. Martínez-Moreno & D. Petko, “Motives for becoming a teacher in times of digital change: Development and validation of the (D)FIT-Choice scale,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, pp. 13221–13245, 2024
Z. Li & W. Y. Guo, “Pre-service teachers’ altruistic motivation for choosing teaching as a career,” Frontiers in Education, 2024
Student teachers’ motivation to teach: The roles of basic psychological needs, teaching self-efficacy, and teaching emotions,” Teaching and Teacher Education, 2024.
S. S. Kula, “The predictive relationship between pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy belief, attitudes towards teaching profession and teaching motivation,” International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 4, 2022.
Motivational Factors Influencing Pre-Service Teachers to Choose Teaching as a Future Career,” Journal of English Language Teaching, 2020.
MotiviEdge and teacher career motivation research articles saved in 2025 literary journals,” Teaching and Teacher Education, 2025 (motivation longitudinal study)
Novita, P. (2023). Teaching is (not) a career priority for student teachers: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Educational Studies and Multidisciplinary Approaches, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.51383/jesma.2023.78
H. M. G. Watt and P. W. Richardson, “Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2007.
P. W. Richardson and H. M. G. Watt, “Who chooses teaching and why?” Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 385–400, 2010.
S. K. Klassen et al., “Teachers’ self-efficacy,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 21–43, 2011.
A. Kyriacou and M. Coulthard, “Undergraduates’ views of teaching as a career,” Journal of Education for Teaching, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 117–126, 2000.
D. F. Putra et al., “Motivasi memilih profesi guru,” Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 89–102, 2018.
R. M. Ingersoll, “The problem of teacher shortages,” Educational Policy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 387–405, 2001.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The-Partial-Least-Squares-Approach-to-Structural-Equation-Modeling.pdf. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods For Business Research. Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
Hair, F. J., Hult, M. T. G., Ringle, M. C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling ( PLS-SEM ).
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of vocational behavior, 45(1), 79-122.
Annur, E. W., & Trisnawati, N. (2023). The Effect of Self-Efficacy and Perception of Teacher Profession on Teaching Interest: Study on Bachelor Students of Office Administration Education. Journal of Office Administration: Education and Practice, 3(3), 175-189.
Lotz, C., Hawlitschek, P., & Deiglmayr, A. (2025). From aspiration to passion – Investigating the role of career choice motivation and self-concept for teacher enthusiasm in early stages of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 165(July 2024), 105102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105102
Wang, H., & Klassen, R. M. (2023). Longitudinal relationships between teachers ’ utility values and quitting intentions : A person-organization fi t perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 127, 104109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104109
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Ekonomi, Akutansi dan Manajemen Nusantara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
